Actual measurement of AI article generation tools and discussion on SEO article creation

Posted by: XinYe 1 month, 2 weeks ago

(0 comments)

In today's AI era, using AI to improve writing efficiency and create SEO articles has become a direction that many teams are exploring. Today I will talk to you in depth about our actual testing of various AI article generation tools, as well as the relevant points of SEO article creation.

1. Basic framework and strategies of SEO

Everyone has a different understanding of SEO, and there are many factions, but the two most important things are nothing more than building external links and generating good content. Some websites only need one page and a large number of external links to rank high on Google; some also take the "PSEO" route and use programs to generate thousands of pages every day to gain traffic, but both methods are considered Extreme approach.

For most product-based startups, it is recommended to put some effort into building external links first so that the website can gain initial weight and thus be easily discovered by Google and gain favorable reviews. After you have the basic weight, invest more time in content creation, so that as the content of the website articles accumulates, the traffic will gradually increase. This is a cheaper, more reliable, and more effective strategy.

2. Practical testing of several mainstream AI article generation tools

(1) Red Sonic

• Promotional advantages : It claims to be able to quickly generate a variety of high-quality content and has many language style options. Originally advertised as being able to create human-level articles in seconds, the model behind it was the GP4. It also provides free gadgets such as free AI rewriting tool, web page title tool, web page meta description generator, etc. These gadgets are very useful for attracting traffic.
• Promotion method : Update 15-20 SEO articles on the blog every month. We also cooperate with many YouTube KOLs to publish explanation videos and comparative evaluation videos. The public account will also publish YouTube short videos.
• User feedback problem : The article does not look like it was written by a real person and is easily detected by AI. Later, it changed its promotion direction, saying that it could collect real-time data and generate articles to assist manual adjustments, but the significance of the tool itself was slightly insufficient. .

(2) Su writing.AI

• Promotion function : Mainly engaged in SEO optimization content generation. It claims that the generated content complies with SEO best practices and can produce long and logical articles. The price is low and articles can be generated with one click (relevant adjustments need to be made before generation). set up).
• Marketing methods : SEO knowledge will also be shared on the Twitter platform by publishing SEO blogs, doing case studies and YouTube video marketing (the most popular ones are Su Writing. AI Comments).
• User feedback problem : The generated content requires humans to spend more time and additional modifications, does not meet the needs, and cannot pass AI detection.

(3) Quick creator

• Key advantages : Simple application and ability to create content quickly.
• Promotion situation : Cooperate with KOL to post comment videos on YouTube. The official website account has posted some content but only has more than 200 followers. The Twitter account is less active. The blog area of ​​the website publishes about 15 SEO articles per month, which is better than Red Sonic. The articles are short and the reading time is mostly within 15 minutes.

(4) Blank board

• Unique advantages : It can realize a fully automated process, and only needs to complete the plug-in installation and binding in the WORDPRESS background, and the learning cost is very low.
• Content defects : Although the operation is simple, the quality of the generated content is insufficient and it is difficult to bring a lot of traffic to the website. The content of the article is relatively vague, the keyword density is low, the structure is insufficient, and the illustration style is relatively simple.

Taken together, these products generally fail to pass AI detection, have average content quality, and most cannot be automated, requiring manual keyword screening and content adjustment. Actual SEO results do not match promotion best practices.

3. Self-developed tools and effects

After our team tried many software on the market, we found that none could meet the requirements, so we spent a long time debugging and making a tool. We are currently using it to promote our products. After publishing a few dozen articles, the site's raw traffic had doubled, and we are now implementing this suite of things across more products. Although the current cost of this tool is relatively high, the AI ​​used is relatively complex, consumes a lot of resources, and has not yet been fully introduced to the market to provide external services, but the effect is better than a blank board. If you have friends who want to do SEO and want to try it, you can also contact us.

In short, in terms of SEO article creation, the current AI article generation tools have their own advantages and disadvantages. You still have to choose an appropriate creation method based on your actual situation, or explore tools that better suit your needs. You are also welcome to share your experience or ideas about using related tools in the comment area. Let us discuss together and continue to make progress on the road of SEO creation.

• ← 十万粉丝程序猿UP主的困境
• 独立开发借势策略 #独立开发 #noteform →